Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
I am grateful and, indeed, I would see that if I found that the language of Clause 14 made that clear. But I do not think it does, does it? There is no reference to specific consent in relation to one application for information. I do not want to prolong the discussion, but the Minister might just have a look at that. I think it needs a bit more drafting. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 182 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] [Amendment No. 183 not moved.] [Amendment No. 184 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] [Amendments Nos. 185 to 187 not moved.] Clause 14 agreed to. Clause 15 [Power to make public services conditional on identity checks]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1290
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Biometrics Crime prevention Costs British nationality Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Information Proof of identity Passports Registration
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:07:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286885
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286885
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286885