Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

I am grateful to the noble Lord; he is quite right. The amendment does refer to line 23, and I confused myself by mistakenly quoting line 24. Line 23 says:"““to carry an ID card with him at all times””." My suspicious legal mind said that that could be overridden. I perfectly understand what the Government seek to do here. They are saying that an individual shall not have to carry an ID card at all, but the provision actually says that he shall not have,"““to carry an ID card with him at all times””." My sinister legal mind says that if the provision were to carry it for 23 hours of the day, it would be within the legislation. The noble Baroness smiles at my cynicism, but I think that she will have to agree with my legal logic and, hence, my amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1291 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Biometrics Crime prevention Costs British nationality Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Information Proof of identity Passports Registration
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk