Proceeding contribution from James Duddridge (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Will my right hon. Friend explain why the Minister has not risen to her feet to explain the difference between the two concepts, and why ““expedient”” will remain in the Bill rather than being replaced with ““reasonable””? This ““reasonable”” amendment seems reasonable, and the word ““expedient”” should be replaced.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1485
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:10 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287157
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287157
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287157