Proceeding contribution from Philip Hollobone (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
In looking at the amendments, I am torn between those tabled by my hon. Friend and those tabled by my right hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Mr. Forth). My hon. Friend’s amendment No. 14 would leave out the words"““appears to the Treasury to be expedient””," whereas my right hon. Friend’s amendment would leave in the word ““Treasury”” and insert"““following consultation with the Commissioner for Revenue and Customs””." I hope that during his remarks my hon. Friend will be able to advance the case for his amendment over that tabled by my right hon. Friend.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1486
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287164
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287164
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287164