Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Not at all. If the right hon. Gentleman allows me to develop my points, he will understand them in a more rounded way—he may still disagree with them and we may not achieve consensus, but he will understand them. Most hon. Members would regard it as unreasonable to hang a man for shoplifting a bar of confectionary, although that is a moral decision and I accept that the result might not be unanimous in this House. I sense that there are differing views in this House about what is a reasonable level of taxation and whether a tax is reasonable at all. For example, I think that a windfall tax on the profits of oil companies, which have made the market and considerably increased the price of oil in the past few months, would be reasonable, but I suspect that many Opposition Members would not think so.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1493
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287187
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287187
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287187