Proceeding contribution from James Duddridge (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the greater duty of care involved means that one needs to be much more careful with the wording in retrospective legislation than in normal legislation? That has been raised several times, but I am still unclear as to whether the hon. Gentleman recognises the distinction.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1494
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:14 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287196
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287196
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287196