Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

The hon. Gentleman is eager—I shall give way shortly. The amendments essentially seek to strip retrospectivity out of the Bill. As I said, we are not discussing a measure that affects the average employee in the street. It tackles artificial tax devices. They are artificial because they change people’s conduct so that they behave in ways in which they would not normally engage. The individuals affected should sue their accountants if they did not warn them of the written ministerial statement that was made on 2 December 2004. That is as far back as retrospectivity would go if the Bill were passed as it is worded and the Government chose to exercise retrospectivity through the Treasury. There is a sort of long stop backwards behind the wicket.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c1495 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk