Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Primarolo (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

This has been a long and broad debate, covering a number of areas. I want to touch on each of them in responding to the amendments. First, I need to remind the House of the context of the proposals that we are considering this afternoon. Both the right hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Mr. Forth) and the hon. Member for Christchurch (Mr. Chope) referred to the question of whether this action was just or right, and the hon. Member for Christchurch spoke about using the mechanism to raise higher national insurance. I remind the House that between 1998 and 2005, both the Conservatives and the present Government produced anti-avoidance legislation in Finance Bills to counter an abuse of tax and national insurance, particularly involving high-value bonuses. Individuals were seeking to disguise their bonuses in order not to declare them as salary, or employment remuneration. They tried to conceal the bonuses, or pretended that they had received the largesse for some other reason and that therefore it was not subject to the normal, straightforward rules of national insurance and tax.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c1498-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk