Proceeding contribution from Ed Balls (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
I am grateful for the chance to intervene again, and I shall try to make sure that I phrase my question more properly. If we had a British written constitution, would that mean that concerns such as those that the right hon. Gentleman has about the Bill would be tackled in another place or through the courts rather than in Parliament? Does he think that that would strengthen or weaken our parliamentary democracy?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1507-8
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Abuse Accountancy Advisory services Eligibility Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Powers National insurance contributions Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:01:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287242
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287242
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287242