Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
My Lords, I am terribly sorry to interrupt, but I think that the noble Baroness may be wrong in referring to Clause 19. Is not Clause 20 the only relevant part? The Box may be able to satisfy us, but I think it is important to get this right on the record.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c537
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Data protection Biometrics Age Costs Fraud Fees and charges ICT Identity cards Investment Interviews Police Personation Procurement National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration Young people Security
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:01:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291477
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291477
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291477