Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill 2005-06.
Identity Cards Bill
My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Gould, is wonderfully provocative. He did not refer to these Report stage amendments, rather he made a good Second Reading speech. I am not going to rise to the bait, but I am blowed if I know which of the amendments he was speaking to. The noble Baroness who has just spoken made some eminently commonsense points. To insert the word ““reasonably””, as proposed in Amendment No. 56A, is entirely sensible, while to insert the word proposed in Amendment No. 59E, so that reference is made to ““essential”” in Clause 12(3) is again absolute common sense. This is not a case of the paranoia of the state, but of producing sensible legislation that achieves its purpose. I wholly support the amendments.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c1020-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Biometrics Crime prevention Death Costs Delegated legislation Fees and charges Identity cards Information Documents Personal records Proof of identity Passports Registration Security Driving licences
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:34:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293623
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293623
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293623