Proceeding contribution from Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
It is always nice to start a discussion in Committee on a quasi-philosophical basis; I was interested to hear the noble Baroness talking about the morality of tax legislation. That is an element of discussion on this kind of legislation that has exercised much of your Lordships’ time. I feel that when one starts talking about morality and tax regulations, one enters a quagmire from which it is relatively difficult to emerge, much as I am in favour of everybody behaving decently. The distinction between ““expedient”” and ““reasonable”” is one without a difference. Equally, we should not be concerned on the noble Baroness’s concern about ““appears to the Treasury””. Who else but the Treasury will exercise the judgment on whether something appears either expedient or reasonable? I find her arguments interesting, but not wholly convincing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c369GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Liability Incentives Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Pay Payments National insurance contributions Tax avoidance Taxation Time limits Tax yields Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:54:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952