Proceeding contribution from Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 January 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
I am grateful for that. I misunderstood the purpose of the question; I thought I was being asked to define ““spatial”” as opposed to ““regional””. However, I will consider the point raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, about the planning system and whether sustainable development ought to be taken into account to a greater extent in development control. It is not a point that had occurred to me before. I hope that I have covered the points raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, and I hope that she is reassured that the wording favoured by the Government will help to protect the environment in the way she sought in her amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c119
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Coastal areas Countryside Biodiversity Environment protection Environment Joint Nature Conservation Committee Planning Nature conservation English Nature Sustainable development Wildlife Rural areas Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:08:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295974
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295974
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295974