Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

I thank the noble Duke for his support. I am slightly surprised at the Minister’s reply. While I accept that information on assistance of a small nature might be too onerous to collect, larger grants of more than £5,000 or £10,000 would be a matter of public interest. For example, have they been distributed on a reasonably equitable regional basis or have they been concentrated in only one region? Many questions might arise. One could say that it is equally onerous to have to go through some freedom of information process to find such basic information. Perhaps the Minister could reflect on whether larger grants might fall under some kind of requirement. I recognise that this is not the stage at which to press such an amendment. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 157 and 158 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] Clause 6 agreed to. Clause 7 [Management agreements]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c274-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Advisory services Finance Enforcement Environment protection Functions Land use Powers Non-departmental public bodies Training Sustainable development Research Rural areas Management agreements Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk