Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

I apologise for interrupting the noble Earl so early in his speech. He thinks that it must be good news, and it is. We think that there is something in what he has said already, about compulsory purchase orders being a part of the Bill. Experimental schemes are absolutely vital, as new delivery methods must be tried. However, as for allowing for compulsory purchase orders, even though they would be used very rarely indeed, I think I know which way the noble Earl’s argument is going. I am not, of course, inviting him to sit down straight away; he must make his point. However, would he be so good as to bear in mind that we are inclined, if not to accept the amendment as it stands, to return with another view on Report regarding compulsory purchase orders?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c280 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Advisory services Finance Enforcement Environment protection Functions Land use Powers Non-departmental public bodies Training Sustainable development Research Rural areas Management agreements Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk