Proceeding contribution from Earl Peel (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
It seems to me that Natural England would need the maximum degree of flexibility in these issues. My question is quite simple. Going back to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Judd, does exclusively having ““provide”” in the Bill prohibit Natural England from commissioning? I do not think that it does.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c282
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Advisory services Finance Enforcement Environment protection Functions Land use Powers Non-departmental public bodies Training Sustainable development Research Rural areas Management agreements Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:01:14 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296931
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296931
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296931