Proceeding contribution from Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 165:"Page 69, line 23, at end insert—" ““( ) In the case of a parent company, the duty imposed by this section shall apply to the directors of the parent company as if the activities of each subsidiary company, whether directly or indirectly held, were undertaken by the parent company.”” The noble Lord said: The Committee will be pleased to know that I have lost my notes on Amendment No. 165. However, it is pretty obvious that unless we get more of a handle on the duties of directors and the duty of care, which are clearer for UK operations than for operations in the rest of the world, we will not be able to contribute to the discussion that we have just been having on Amendment No. 163. I am sure that my noble and learned friend has copious notes which make one or two points about this and I do not wish to deny him that opportunity.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c279-80GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Company law Companies Directors Civil proceedings Conduct Finance Liability Management Taxation Shareholders Transfer pricing
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:03:50 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297910
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297910
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297910