Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.


Electoral Administration Bill

The noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, makes a valid point, but if we remove Clause 4, it is not permissive. That is the point and why I am concerned. A future government might take this as a signal that this is not an appropriate responsibility for a public body and they might want to privatise it. As the Minister said earlier, computer schemes in the public sector have not been wild successes, but nor have schemes in the private sector—of course, it is often the same consultants giving advice on both with an equal lack of success. If a future government, perhaps of a different colour, decided that this was a suitable responsibility for a private organisation, I would be filled with horror. The commission is prepared to take on this responsibility; it has made clear how it would operate as CORE keeper and that it would be accountable and answerable to Parliament through the Speaker’s Committee. I simply ask what other organisation the noble Baroness has in mind.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c109-10GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Contracts Data protection Databases Administration Fraud Finance Elections Electorate ICT Electoral Commission Electoral register Registration Electoral registration officers Coordinated online record of electors
Legislation
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk