Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
I am grateful for that explanation. There is clearly a difference between buying in software and putting the whole thing out to another organisation. We have recently had, in a different sort of electoral area, some bad experiences with the electoral register since the last election going to Pickfords. No doubt Pickfords does a wonderful job in all kinds of areas, but it has not done a wonderful job in maintaining the marked registers or keeping them since the last election. That is just a minor example of where such a contract was not appropriate and it has not worked. However, on the basis of the assurances that I have been given, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 5 agreed to. Clause 6 [CORE schemes: procedure]: [Amendment No. 37 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c114GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Contracts Data protection Databases Administration Fraud Finance Elections Electorate ICT Electoral Commission Electoral register Registration Electoral registration officers Coordinated online record of electors
- Legislation
- Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:13:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303474
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303474
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303474