Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. Can the noble Baroness help me and the whole House? She indicated that the Government had considered the report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights—we said that the lack of clarity and over-breadth were serious problems—but that the Government did not agree with the Joint Committee’s view. She said that the great virtue of the word ““glorification”” is its clarity. Will the Minister explain to the House how a judge will be able to direct a jury so as to distinguish between acts of glorification and other acts? How can one avoid the risk of political discrimination or manipulation of the criminal justice system? One person’s glorification of terrorism would be another person’s glorification of historical events regarded as glorious: let us say, after the Easter Rising, in relation to the ANC or other historical events. How will a judge be able to direct a jury without any criteria? How will we be able to avoid the risk of political manipulation leading to a lack of confidence among British Muslims?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c140 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Incitement History Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk