Proceeding contribution from Lord Grabiner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
My Lords, I will be extremely brief because I suspect that all the points that could have been made have already been made. Is it not plain that the examples given by the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, are obviously capable of amounting to glorification? More to the point, is it not obvious that a jury would be entitled so to conclude? The word ““glorify””, or ““glorification””, is a simple English word that would be well understood by an English jury.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c155
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Incitement History Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:03:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510