Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 March 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers’ Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2006.
Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers’ Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2006
Does the noble Lord wish to continue on that point? Surely, if the insurance lapses, so does the insurance cover. Therefore, if the firm has gone out of business, how can insurance be paid to the sufferer?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c192GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Compensation Applications Business Liability Insurance Industrial diseases Payments Mining Lump sum payments Pneumoconiosis Uprating Industrial injuries disablement benefit
- Legislation
- Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers' Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:35:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304604
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304604
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304604