Proceeding contribution from Earl of Erroll (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
My Lords, if I may intervene, the noble Baroness can probably answer the two points at the same time. I do not understand from the previous discussion why the common law cannot evolve a definition of what is an okay apology and what is not if it is in the Bill. Surely we just proceed and the courts will soon sort it out.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c665
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Appeals Courts Damages Civil liability Accidents Enforcement Health and safety Insurance companies Exemptions Ethics Personal injury Staff Negligence Standards Schools Training Regulation Trespass Claims management services Claims Management Services Tribunal
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 16:33:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305814
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305814
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305814