Proceeding contribution from Lord Monson (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
My Lords, I, too, have an attraction to the amendment. As I understand it, as a non-lawyer, it would not take one back to the pre-1984 position, in so far as it would apply only to those who trespassed with a view to committing a crime. It would not cover simple trespass, whereby someone wandered on to land accidentally or without any intention of committing crime. That is desirable and, for that reason, I wholly support the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c672
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Appeals Courts Damages Civil liability Accidents Enforcement Health and safety Insurance companies Exemptions Ethics Personal injury Staff Negligence Standards Schools Training Regulation Trespass Claims management services Claims Management Services Tribunal
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 16:47:43 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305824
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305824
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305824