Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ann Coffey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Childcare Bill.


Childcare Bill

That is the most unutterable rubbish that I have ever heard in this Chamber. The investment in children’s centres is a recognition that we have to do something about disadvantage from an early age. Providing a general duty to address inequalities will lead to the development at a local level of policies that take particular account of helping the most disadvantaged because of the way in which that service provision will then be developed. For example, extra cash for improving school meals may make a local authority consider giving a subsidy to parents who are just above the level for qualification for free school meals. That would encourage parents to let their children have school meals instead of lunchboxes. As part of that initiative, parents might be encouraged to come in and talk about diet. That might help to reduce inequalities in outcomes in the long term. Without a duty to address inequalities, there will not be the same kind of pressure for innovative thinking at a local level to ensure that in every policy area thought is given to ensuring that outcomes for the most disadvantaged are improved.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1011-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Data protection Databases Childcare Curriculum Disadvantaged Childminding Equality Health Disqualification Information Local government Low incomes Powers of entry Protection Parents Police Pre-school education Poverty Local government services Police cautions Registration Standards Vetting Schools Sexual offences
Legislation
Childcare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk