Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Peter Bottomley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Childcare Bill.


Childcare Bill

If the omission had not been spotted and the amendment had not been tabled, this is the kind of change that the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill could properly deal with. The Government would be well advised to ensure that such a change would be covered by that Bill. The Minister ought to congratulate the person who spotted the omission. On Government amendment No. 17, it is right to pay tribute to those who advise the Minister and are involved in the drafting of the Bill. When a Bill proposes amendments to nine Acts, things are as complicated as they can be, especially in relation to consequential changes. Those who do that work deserve praise. The work is not as exciting as some of the policy changes and arguments, but detailed attention to what is in a Bill does matter.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1030-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Data protection Databases Childcare Curriculum Disadvantaged Childminding Equality Health Disqualification Information Local government Low incomes Powers of entry Protection Parents Police Pre-school education Poverty Local government services Police cautions Registration Standards Vetting Schools Sexual offences
Legislation
Childcare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk