Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister for his response. I understand what he is saying but it is curious that Clause 492(3) refers specifically to the civil liability position in relation to signing the auditor’s report and yet the Bill is silent in respect of anything else. This could lead to the conclusion that being named—or something else—could lead to liability. It is because of the specificity about signing that people have raised the concern that there may be some other way of being dragged into civil liability. That is why the two amendments in this group—both mine and the one in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Sharman—seek to broaden Clause 492(3) to reflect that concern. The way in which the subsection refers only to signing is unsatisfactory.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c398GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Animal experiments Finance Liability Harassment Internet Shares Shareholders Vacancies
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:35:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308071
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308071
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308071