Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Is the parallel drawn by the noble Baroness knowingly or recklessly inaccurate? I think it has no bearing on the point at all. We are talking about different responsibilities. In this regard, the auditors’ responsibility is quite separate and different from the parallel that she wants to draw.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c412GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Animal experiments Finance Liability Harassment Internet Shares Shareholders Vacancies
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:07:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308103
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308103
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308103