Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. A6:"Page 250, line 18, leave out from first ““it”” to ““as”” in line 19 and insert ““makes an offer which is conditional upon its reregistering””" The noble Lord said: This amendment has come to us from the Law Society. Its purpose is to clarify the meaning of subsection (3)(a). The subsection provides an exemption from the prohibition on private companies offering securities to the public when, in summary, the company is to reregister as a public company. The ““in pursuance of arrangement”” formulation appears far too vague; we question whether it is meant to capture anything other than entering into agreements to allot conditional on reregistration before allotment. If that is the case, what would happen if the company was unable to reregister but was obliged to continue with the allotment? It appears in those circumstances that no contravention would have taken place and that the allotment would stand. Again, I question why that would be. I realise that this is a very technical area and that the Minister may want to take it away and think about it. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c451GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Animal experiments Finance Liability Harassment Internet Shares Shareholders Vacancies
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk