Skip to main content

1-20 of 256 results for member:"Lord Sharman"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble Lord, Lord Harrison, for introducing this debate and for giving me the opportunity to make a few remarks about trade and business with Morocco. As your Lordships will know, I was appointed the Prime Minister’s trade envoy to Morocco at the end of...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2013
Reference
746 cc273-5GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress has been made in evaluating the business reviews being published by companies under the Companies Act 2006.

Asked by
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
2071; 709 c137WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance is produced for companies on narrative reporting in the light of the financial crisis and the Climate Change Act 2008.

Asked by
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
2072; 709 c145WA
House
House of Lords

I, too, declare an interest as a director and chairman of a number of companies, all of which are set out in the register of interests of your Lordships’ House. Like the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, I support the consolidation that we have managed to achieve. I shall go back...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2008
Reference
700 c35GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Statutory Auditors (Delegation of Functions etc.) Order 2008. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vadera
Answering member
Lord Sharman
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
699 c370-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again I will not delay your Lordships long. The order, which brings into effect a regime of regulation for the conduct of statutory audits and their auditors, has been debated widely and has been the subject of much consultation. It is very welcome that this replaces the old...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
699 c371
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not delay your Lordships long on a day when matters of significant moment have been debated. By and large, these measures are very welcome. There is a clear need to update the fines and penalties for late filing and it is absolutely right that the arrangements...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
699 c370
House
House of Lords

Draft Companies (Late Filing Penalties) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Filing Periods and Late Filing Penalties) Regulations 2008. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vadera
Answering member
Lord Sharman
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
21 February 2008
Reference
699 c368-70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first declare an interest as a chairman and director of listed companies in the UK, the full details of which are set out in the Register of Lords’ Interests. I am also a former chairman of the audit firm, KPMG International. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2007
Reference
693 c886-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the Minister confirm that the Government are well aware of the way in which the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has impacted on the attractiveness and competitiveness of the United States capital market? So much so is that the case that, I believe, Mr Hank Paulson is conducting a review of it with a view to amending it. Can the Minister further confirm that the Government will bear that in mind when it comes to drafting regulations required under the Companies Bill, which will return to this House in a short time?
Asked by
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1083-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c244
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall not repeat everything that the noble Baroness said about our thanks for how the Government have responded to the concerns expressed in Committee. We now have a workable series of clauses that respond to our original concerns. Although my name is not attached to Amendment No. 391A, the...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c159-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the response that the Government have made to the concerns I raised in Committee. Amendment No. 408 was proposed to us by the Law Society. I accept that it is a wide enabling amendment. I would like to consider carefully the impact of the government amendment and, if...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c165
House
House of Lords

Yes, my Lords, I do. The only issue between us is precisely the one he mentioned up front; that is, the question of whether the words reflect what we are seeking to achieve. In the opinion of the Law Society that is not the case. I will look at what he said,...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c169
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 398:"Page 252, line 36, leave out ““calculated”” and insert ““intended””" The noble Lord said: My Lords, I rise to move Amendment No. 398 and to speak to Amendments Nos. 399 to 403. These amendments go back to an issue we raised in Committee. The amendments, all in Clause 530, deal with the intention behind the issue of shares....

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c165-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for responding to the amendments, which were tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson. In addressing this issue I shall speak also to Amendment No. 424, which is in my name. I simply want to say that the noble Lord’s Amendment No. 423 substantially addresses the issue that we...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his full explanation of this matter. I am content with it. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 428 not moved.] Clause 576 [Power of private companies to redeem or purchase own shares out of capital]:

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c183
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 427:"Page 276, line 26, leave out ““principal purpose”” and insert ““predominant reason””" The noble Lord said: My Lords, in moving Amendment No. 427, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 428, which is grouped with it. We return to the issue of a definition, and we are advised in this matter by the Law...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c181-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful that the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, did not give us the benefit of her wisdom on IFRS or we should still be here tomorrow. However, I agree with the noble Baronesses, Lady Goudie and Lady Noakes, that this area desperately needs attention. Incidentally, it has a much broader application...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c187-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for that very full reply from the Minister, and for his acknowledgement that the amendments he mentioned will be looked at. I  hope that the Government will be bringing forward their own amendments to deal with those issues. In my mind, the issue is still unresolved. I would...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c169
House
House of Lords