Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).


Company Law Reform Bill

Before the noble Lord decides what he is going to do with the amendment, I wish to ask the Minister a question. Does he agree that there is a difference between Clauses 528 and 529? Clause 528 concerns ““proposing to act””. That is an ex ante action. I understand that; it is the post-event that is so difficult. The Minister made a good case on why one needs to have strong potential deterrence where a company is proposing to act. My concern is where a company finds that it has done something ex post of a minor nature and it is then left in this very difficult circumstance that, no matter how minor, the court has no discretion to get the company off the hook on which it may inadvertently have impaled itself.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c477GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Company law Companies Directors Exemptions Staff Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk