Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Company Law Reform Bill
Before the noble Lord decides what he is going to do with the amendment, I wish to ask the Minister a question. Does he agree that there is a difference between Clauses 528 and 529? Clause 528 concerns ““proposing to act””. That is an ex ante action. I understand that; it is the post-event that is so difficult. The Minister made a good case on why one needs to have strong potential deterrence where a company is proposing to act. My concern is where a company finds that it has done something ex post of a minor nature and it is then left in this very difficult circumstance that, no matter how minor, the court has no discretion to get the company off the hook on which it may inadvertently have impaled itself.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c477GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Company law Companies Directors Exemptions Staff Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:49:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308802
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308802
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308802