Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Company Law Reform Bill
I thank the Minister for his detailed and very specific response. What he is saying is that in this age of flexibility you can be flexible, so long as it is more onerous. It cannot be less onerous than the statutory minimum. Our advice is that—and it is not because of malice aforethought—the structures of private companies and so forth want to have less onerous requirements agreed between them. We shall bring forward specific examples if we can; we would probably like to come back on this. However, now having the Government’s position on the record, for which I am extremely grateful, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c528-9GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Company law Companies Directors Exemptions Staff Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:36:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308907
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308907
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308907