Proceeding contribution from Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
With the greatest respect to the Home Secretary, his reaction to our sincere and, as it happens, rather open attempts to reach agreement, as revealed by the amendment, will discourage us the next time that we wish to achieve cross-party agreement on such matters. My recollection is that the UN’s use of the word ““glorification”” was heavily qualified by legal understandings of intention and purposeful activity in the act of glorifying—understandings that have been excluded from this Bill. So the read-across to the UN understanding of ““glorification”” is not entirely valid.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c1675
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Incitement Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:04:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360