Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Graham Stuart (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the House might be being too kind to the Government by assuming that they have a rationale for the use of the word ““glorification”” in the Bill? Is it not possible that the Government’s aim has been to create an entirely artificial division in the mind of the public? The argument makes the Government appear to be strong on terrorism, while leaving everyone else who oppose the Govt—on the Conservative, Liberal Democrat or even Labour Benches—looking somehow weak on the matter. Does he agree that this dangerous legislation could have been introduced for such cynical reasons?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1676 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Incitement Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk