Proceeding contribution from Graham Stuart (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the House might be being too kind to the Government by assuming that they have a rationale for the use of the word ““glorification”” in the Bill? Is it not possible that the Government’s aim has been to create an entirely artificial division in the mind of the public? The argument makes the Government appear to be strong on terrorism, while leaving everyone else who oppose the Govt—on the Conservative, Liberal Democrat or even Labour Benches—looking somehow weak on the matter. Does he agree that this dangerous legislation could have been introduced for such cynical reasons?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c1676
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Incitement Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:04:17 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309366
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309366
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309366