Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Company Law Bill [HL]
I understand the point that the Minister is making. However, I am not sure that in his remarks he has dealt with my point about the clause permitting redenomination, subject to conditions. If in fact this is restricted to the 15-day period referred to, it clearly significantly limits the conditions that in practice can be applied to the redenomination. For that reason I suggested a longer period. I have no pride in three months; I just think that in practical terms 15 days is too short. I certainly would not go so far as the year that the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, suggests because of the spot-rate point. I just think that in practical terms, if you are permitting conditions to be applied to the redenomination, 15 days is too short. I hope that, before we come back to this, the Minister could give some thought on whether 15 days is too short a period.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c36-7GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Company law Company accounts Companies Business interests Finance Investment income Membership Meetings Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:04:46 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037