Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].


Company Law Bill [HL]

I understand the point that the Minister is making. However, I am not sure that in his remarks he has dealt with my point about the clause permitting redenomination, subject to conditions. If in fact this is restricted to the 15-day period referred to, it clearly significantly limits the conditions that in practice can be applied to the redenomination. For that reason I suggested a longer period. I have no pride in three months; I just think that in practical terms 15 days is too short. I certainly would not go so far as the year that the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, suggests because of the spot-rate point. I just think that in practical terms, if you are permitting conditions to be applied to the redenomination, 15 days is too short. I hope that, before we come back to this, the Minister could give some thought on whether 15 days is too short a period.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c36-7GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Company law Company accounts Companies Business interests Finance Investment income Membership Meetings Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk