Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Company Law Bill [HL]
I do not think that we would keep the same effect if we moved subsection (6) into subsection (3), as subsection (5) states:"““The reduction of capital is not effective until those documents are registered””—" that is, those provided for in subsection (6). It is that which we are seeking to uncouple. I hope that has dealt with the point, but perhaps we should reflect on what is printed in Hansard.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c45-6GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Company law Company accounts Companies Business interests Finance Investment income Membership Meetings Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:42:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060