Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].


Company Law Bill [HL]

Perhaps I shall repeat the last paragraph. We have chosen to use language of giving instructions to cover this sort of situation; one could also describe it in terms of ““exercising rights””. The difference between the language of the Bill and that of the amendment is that ““exercising rights”” could cover a broader range of circumstances. We are grateful to the Law Society for raising the point, and we will think carefully about what the noble Lord said. At this stage we are reluctant to make any commitment to changing the current drafting. We need to consider further what additional rights would be covered by the wording that the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, proposes, and whether it is appropriate to refer to them all in this context. To date, our main concern has been simply to preserve the existing right of registered shareholders, and subsection (4)(b) is effective for that purpose.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c53GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Company law Company accounts Companies Business interests Finance Investment income Membership Meetings Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk