Proceeding contribution from Mark Fisher (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
There are all sorts of variations on who is being more flexible. The truth is that there is a difference of opinion between having a low-tech, low-cost voluntary card and a high-tech, high-cost compulsory card that is rooted in the register. The House and the public ought to have the chance to resolve that. This way of trying to nudge up to and sidle round a compromise is not satisfactory. Let us get to the nub of the question. If the Home Secretary will not enable us to do that, he must come up with some movement himself. I will certainly vote against the motion again tonight and I hope that the other place votes accordingly and that we will return to the matter later this week. I hope that, by that stage, the Home Secretary will have had second thoughts and found some measure of flexibility in his position. It being one hour after commencement of proceedings, Madam Deputy Speaker put the Question, pursuant to Order [13 February]. The House proceeded to a Division.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 444 c197
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Biometrics Costs Identity cards Passports
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:57:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310717
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310717
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310717