Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.


Electoral Administration Bill

If I can go backwards through the amendments, on Amendment No. 84, the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, was very perceptive. She noticed that when I turned to that page of the amendments I started to talk to the wrong amendment but very rapidly started talking to the right amendment. She will get a tick for that on her performance assessment; no doubt we will all have those in due course. I am grateful for what the Minister said, but I would have liked it to have been stronger. If in a registration authority both the registration officer and the local authority feel strongly that they are not capable of conducting a pilot, and if perhaps two or three London boroughs thought that they could not cope with it, it would be wrong to impose it. Let us take a hypothetical situation where a highly competent authority such as Kensington and Chelsea might say that it could not handle a pilot because it was dealing with HMO problems, getting the register in order, and the millions of languages that the noble Baroness was talking about last week. I notice, for the benefit of the tape, as they say, that the Minister is agreeing with me—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c81GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Constituencies Age Fraud Elections ICT Electronic voting Electoral Commission Electoral register Pilot schemes Multiple occupation Proof of identity Scotland Registration Voting methods
Legislation
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk