Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
I did not comment before because I wanted to hear what the noble Baroness had to say. My noble friend Lord Norton has perhaps taken into account the postal vote pilot that we want to see. If so, the amendment fits quite neatly with that. If we take that into account, it would not be necessary for everybody to sign up the first time; it would be necessary when everybody wanted a postal vote to have their identifiers in place. Under those circumstances, and hearing what the noble Baroness has said—which is in a sense a softening of hard lines—the amendment is very appropriate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c99-100GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Constituencies Age Fraud Elections ICT Electronic voting Electoral Commission Electoral register Pilot schemes Multiple occupation Proof of identity Scotland Registration Voting methods
- Legislation
- Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:20:37 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310930
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310930
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310930