Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, and my noble friend Lord Freeman for their comments, and the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, and the Minister for theirs. However, I am afraid we are still apart. There is a simple difference of opinion which can be distilled down to the fact that we believe the OFT’s powers are extended by the Bill and that there needs to be a balanced framework within which those powers are exercised, and the Government disagree. In those circumstances, I think it is appropriate to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 2) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 132; Not-Contents, 150.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c148-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Credit Credit cards Licensing Financial services Loans Office of Fair Trading Regulation
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:55:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311021
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311021
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311021