Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

My Lords, I thank the Minister and I thank the House for allowing the Minister to respond. However, he has not answered any of the questions that I asked him. The first was on how to achieve statutory guidance. Earlier we had been told what the situation was in a letter that we received from Alun Michael on the Monday, but by Thursday we were told that it was not possible to have guidance. Secondly, the Minister has given no indication that that may be reviewed at some time in the future. I do not want to get on the wrong side of things, but I am forced to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 82; Not-Contents, 193. Clause 18 [Commission’s general purpose]: [Amendment No. 4 not moved.] Clause 19 [Representation, advice and monitoring]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c560-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Community development Climate change Environment protection Functions Motor vehicles Powers Nature conservation National parks Rights of way Road traffic control Rural areas Sites of special scientific interest Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk