Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

I listened carefully to the noble and learned Lord, but I repeat that there is an overriding requirement for a three-fourths majority. The same majority is required in other parts of companies legislation—for a special resolution of members, for example. If the Government are satisfied that it is right to maintain a special resolution requiring three-fourths of the membership, I cannot see why they would not want to do that in this case. Nevertheless, I will consider what the noble and learned Lord has said. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c326GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk