Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

In opposing that Clause 681 should stand part of the Bill, I seek to remove the power of the Secretary of State to make regulations requiring documents to be delivered to the registrar by electronic means. The clause gives power to the Secretary of State to make regulations, by the affirmative resolution procedure, requiring companies to deliver documents to the registrar by electronic means if the registrar has published rules setting out the detailed requirements for such delivery. While we support the provision in Clause 682 for a voluntary procedure for electronic delivery of documents, we consider that it is disproportionate for companies—especially small companies—to be required to make the investment in the technology required to prepare and file documents electronically, or to engage professionals to do so on their behalf. We see no benefit in this provision. If my opposition to the clause were to be successful, references to Clause 681 elsewhere in the Bill—for example, in Clause 684(1)(b)—would need to be deleted.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c347-8GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk