Proceeding contribution from James Paice (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Lords amendment No. 33 reaches the heart of the Meyrick judgment on what natural beauty is by defining it in a way that I—and the whole House, I am sure—am more than happy with. Perhaps the Minister will explain why that is not sufficient, and why Lords amendment No. 17 is necessary on top of it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 444 c952
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Cultural heritage Inspections Enforcement Environment protection Motor vehicles Nature conservation Motorcycles Pesticides National parks Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Sites of special scientific interest Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:03:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516