Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 April 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.


Violent Crime Reduction Bill

moved Amendment No. 31:"Page 7, line 3, leave out subsection (4) and insert—" ““(4)   Permission of the court is required for the making or hearing of an application in accordance with subsection (3).”” The noble Viscount said: This amendment ensures that it is the court and not the justices’ clerk that has to give permission for an application to be heard without notice. It is my understanding that the role of justices’ clerks is primarily an advisory one, along with some case management responsibilities. Given the potential risk of injustice for someone to be made subject to one of these orders in their absence and without notice, it seems more appropriate that this decision be taken by the magistrates themselves rather than it being delegated to the justices’ clerk. The purpose of the amendment is not to make any criticism of the role of justices’ clerks, but merely to guarantee that questions of this seriousness should be treated as judicial decisions, not as merely administrative ones. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c195-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Children Clubs Crime prevention Alcoholic drinks Courts Crimes of violence Age County courts Certification Fees and charges Families Exemptions Homelessness Licensed premises Local government Medical treatments Police Misuse Public order offences Rehabilitation Young people Violence Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones
Legislation
Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk