Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 April 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
The amendment would replace Clause 8(4). That provides that provision for the making or hearing of an application for an interim order must be made by the court, for proceedings in the county court, or the justices’ clerk for applications to a magistrates’ court. Instead, the amendment proposes that permission of a court be required for interim orders for those made without notice or in the absence of the individual. However, the amendment does not reflect the different court procedures that should be adopted in the magistrates’ court from the county court, where permissions are required for the making or hearing of an application or for an interim banning order. That difference needs to be specified in the Bill. For that reason, we cannot encourage the Committee to press the amendments.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c196
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Children Clubs Crime prevention Alcoholic drinks Courts Crimes of violence Age County courts Certification Fees and charges Families Exemptions Homelessness Licensed premises Local government Medical treatments Police Misuse Public order offences Rehabilitation Young people Violence Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:54:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600