Proceeding contribution from Lord Beamish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
I always enjoy the hon. Gentleman’s contributions. He has been cut loose from the Front Bench and takes opposing views to those of some of the more radical elements of his Front-Bench team. Does he agree that he should encourage his constituents to consider alternatives, such as liquefied petroleum gas, that would not only be more environmentally friendly to his beautiful constituency, but allow them to pay less vehicle excise duty?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1060
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:48:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319393
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319393
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319393