Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, I support the noble Baroness in these amendments. She asked me to confirm that my report did not envisage the creation of a two-tier structure. I can confirm that most assuredly. Nothing was further from our minds at the time. We thought that a company is a company is a company. We were persuaded that the C&AG should be able to audit companies. I shall have to be careful in my choice of words. I was going to say that this is a cynical attempt to get around the implementation of what I recommended. I do not see how you can have two types of company. A company’s objective may not be profit-making, but that is irrelevant: it is a company; that is the important thing. Our corporate legislation has always been, not about the company’s objectives, but about responding to the limitation of liability by audit and public reporting. That is what company law is about. It is not about whether you choose to incorporate a company to do A, B or C. If you incorporate, you limit liability. Therefore, you are bound by certain rules and regulations which you must adhere to, one of which is to audit within a corporate regime.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c1007-8 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Data protection Crime Charities Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Contributions Annual reports Fraud Finance Liability Donors Internet Pay Political parties Public companies Negligence Private companies Small businesses
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk