Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My Lords, in Grand Committee I, too, expressed reservations about the drafting of these clauses. Since then I have unfortunately become the recipient of a derivative claim in another country that is not subject to the sort of safeguards set out here. I am acutely aware of how such claims work when there are not adequate front-end safeguards. I echo the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson: we are grateful for the work being done on stiffening, if I can use that word, the procedure by which such claims might be made. There should be a procedure for derivative claims but we must avoid opening a Pandora’s Box to every disenchanted individual in the country. Although I echo the words of the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, that we may want to think about what is included here, I am very satisfied with what I see before me.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c885
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Accountability Charities Community interest companies Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Fraud Finance Families Liability Insolvency Harassment Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:02:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320682
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320682
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320682